vidas
MVP-Score averages
MVP-Score evolution
6.2 / 10
This number is simply the average of every current roster member's MVP-Score across all the Flex games they've played together.
Want to see what the team looks like without a given player? Click a name in the legend on the graph to toggle them out, the team average recomputes live based on who's still selected.
Why DRAKOXSAXCOX is your most clutch player ?
This ranking is based on the MVP score (out of 10) calculated from KDA, gold per minute, vision score, kill participation, damage dealt, and utility stats. DRAKOXSAXCOX scored above 8/10 4 times!
Want more details? How's MVP-Score calculated ?
Why Lerfix is your most improving player ?
This shows who has the most progression over time. Lerfix has been getting better game after game, with an improvement rate of 1.2 !
Why Lerfix is your most unstable player ?
This shows who has the most inconsistent performance. Lerfix can go from amazing games to terrible ones - their MVP scores vary a lot between matches, with a variation of 1.1!
Global statistics
A bird's-eye view of how the roster has been performing lately, core numbers, trends and individual contributions across recent Flex games.
Team insights
What to keep, change or watch — based on your recent games.
For your team
Ideas for your next drafts and games.
Baron: +33% WR for you when secured vs +46% Master+ average. Work mid-game conversion instead of forcing without setup.
Objectives vs other teams
Compared to 1,827 other Flex 5/Ranked 5s teams in our benchmark pool.
Observed winrate difference (with first vs without) in percentage points.
OthersFirst Dragon in 58% of games. Observed WR difference: 45.7 pts (reference: 21.9 pts). No statistically supported weakness in the current sample.
- +You secure first Dragon in 58% of games in the current sample.
- +Winrate is 86% in games with first Dragon vs 40% without (45.7 pts observed difference).
- +Observed WR difference (45.7 pts) exceeds the reference (21.9 pts).
- →Only 7 games include first Dragon; at least 10 are required to compare winrates reliably.
- →WR association and volume come from different benchmark pools — treat the gap as indicative, not exact.
WR association vs LoL-Tracker team benchmark (1827 Flex/Ranked 5v5 games) · Volume vs Master+ coordinated 5v5 pool (163814 team-sides)
See the numbers
- First secure: 58% of team games (7 with first) · reference: 55%
- Objectives per game: 1.92 dragons (team) · 1.95 (reference)
- WR with first secure: 86% · without: 40%
- Observed WR difference: 45.7 pts (team) · 21.9 pts (reference) · gap: +23.8 pts
- Team split: 7 with first · 5 without
- Reference split: 1010 with first · 817 without
- Draft fit: Scaling Teamfight
Roster vs others
One card per starter — biggest stat gap vs the LoL-Tracker benchmark pool (Flex 5 & Ranked 5s).
Others
Mixed profile vs other teams
Mixed profile vs other teams
Mixed profile vs other teams
High damage output
Strong map involvement
Pool meta profile
Your pool fits the current meta well.
YasuoC
SeraphineS
XayahA
GragasB
KaynA
NautilusBDraft archetypes
Your most common draft shapes — last 3 comps per archetype.
AI coach
Concrete actions for your next game, grounded in what your data reveals: team-level priorities, personal focus for every player, and the patterns behind the advice.
How does our virtual coach work? →Unlock your AI coach
An AI coach reads every Flex game your squad plays and ships concrete, per-player and team-level advice. Available on the Try harder and Pro plans.
On the Pro plan you also get a direct chat with the coach, grounded in your team's data, to ask follow-up questions between sessions.
See plansYou're currently on the Free plan.
944
4,542
16,655
LoL-Tracker isn't endorsed by Riot Games and doesn't reflect the views or opinions of Riot Games or anyone officially involved in producing or managing League of Legends.