Squad Trolling
MVP-Score averages
MVP-Score evolution
5.4 / 10
This number is simply the average of every current roster member's MVP-Score across all the Flex games they've played together.
Want to see what the team looks like without a given player? Click a name in the legend on the graph to toggle them out, the team average recomputes live based on who's still selected.
Why strawberryiu is your most clutch player ?
This ranking is based on the MVP score (out of 10) calculated from KDA, gold per minute, vision score, kill participation, damage dealt, and utility stats. strawberryiu scored above 8/10 2 times!
Want more details? How's MVP-Score calculated ?
Why liljony is your most improving player ?
This shows who has the most progression over time. liljony has been getting better game after game, with an improvement rate of 1.1 !
Why liljony is your most unstable player ?
This shows who has the most inconsistent performance. liljony can go from amazing games to terrible ones - their MVP scores vary a lot between matches, with a variation of 1.8!
Global statistics
A bird's-eye view of how the roster has been performing lately, core numbers, trends and individual contributions across recent Flex games.
Team insights
What to keep, change or watch — based on your recent games.
For your team
Ideas for your next drafts and games.
Herald: +-16% WR for you when secured vs +25% Master+ average. Work mid-game conversion instead of forcing without setup.
Objectives vs other teams
Compared to 1,776 other Flex 5/Ranked 5s teams in our benchmark pool.
Observed winrate difference (with first vs without) in percentage points.
First Baron in 44% of games. Observed WR difference: 37.5 pts (reference: 45.8 pts). No statistically supported weakness in the current sample.
- +You secure first Baron in 44% of games in the current sample.
- →First Baron is less strongly associated with winning for you (37.5 pts) than in the reference (45.8 pts).
- →Only 8 games include first Baron; at least 10 are required to compare winrates reliably.
- →WR association and volume come from different benchmark pools — treat the gap as indicative, not exact.
WR association vs LoL-Tracker team benchmark (1776 Flex/Ranked 5v5 games) · Volume vs Master+ coordinated 5v5 pool (157712 team-sides)
See the numbers
- First secure: 44% of team games (8 with first) · reference: 42%
- Objectives per game: 0.5 barons (team) · 0.54 (reference)
- WR with first secure: 88% · without: 50%
- Observed WR difference: 37.5 pts (team) · 45.8 pts (reference) · gap: -8.3 pts
- Team split: 8 with first · 10 without
- Reference split: 746 with first · 1030 without
- Draft fit: Scaling Teamfight
Roster vs others
One card per starter — biggest stat gap vs the LoL-Tracker benchmark pool (Flex 5 & Ranked 5s).
Mixed profile vs other teams
Mixed profile vs other teams
Mixed profile vs other teams
Mixed profile vs other teams
Early game pulse
How your laning and first 15 minutes look across your sample — gold leads, plates and throws.
Even laning @10 — first move on Herald/drag often decides tempo.
Big @15 leads — your mid-game should be proactive, not ARAM.
You donate plates — match crash timing or swap sides.
Clean closing when ahead — vision and plates after a lead.
Pool meta profile
A mix of meta picks and comfort champions.
Side winrate
Draft archetypes
Your most common draft shapes — last 3 comps per archetype.
AI coach
Concrete actions for your next game, grounded in what your data reveals: team-level priorities, personal focus for every player, and the patterns behind the advice.
How does our virtual coach work? →Unlock your AI coach
An AI coach reads every Flex game your squad plays and ships concrete, per-player and team-level advice. Available on the Try harder and Pro plans.
On the Pro plan you also get a direct chat with the coach, grounded in your team's data, to ask follow-up questions between sessions.
See plansYou're currently on the Free plan.

